HOME     |      FEATURES     |      CLUBHOUSE     |      CAMPS     |      LINKS     |      ABOUT US     |      STORE     |      ADVERTISE
PlanetFieldHockey.com Home  

Highlight articles
from the last
Umpiring
Rules: Hockey looks to cricket for tech lessons There is a comment on this article
Planet Field Hockey
Planet Field Hockey
August 17, 2003
The Asian Age
> Page Views 5239

Amstelveen (Holland), Aug. 17: The case for third umpire in international hockey was strengthened following the controversial India versus Holland game in the 25th Champions Trophy tournament on Saturday.
And it was becoming increasingly clear that cricket, whose popularity has pushed India?s national sport to relative oblivion, could show the way.
On Saturday, Holland, trailing 0-3 with seven minutes remaining, snatched a thrilling 4-3 win. But the Indians hotly disputed the third Dutch goal saying that the ball had not crossed the goal-line when Baljit Singh Saini stopped and cleared a try by Floris Evers.
Bob Davidzon, chairman, marketing committee of the International Hockey Federation and former head of the rules board, said the third umpire was experimented with in the women?s World Cup and the Sultan Azlan Shah tournaments earlier this year. ?In the World Cup, the third umpire was referred to seven times in 42 matches. The pitch umpire was correct in five instances,? Davidzon said.
?In the Azlan Shah Tournament, the third umpire was called for on four occasions. The pitch umpire was right thrice,? he added.
He felt that the incident like last night?s in the India-Holland game, was a rare occurrence. ?We simply cannot start referring each and every decision to the third umpire as that would mean a match would last two hours instead of 70 minutes,? he said.
?Unlike in cricket, the decision of the pitch umpire in hockey is final and binding, and not that of the third umpire.?
Davidzon said the umpires at the women?s World Cup and the Azlan Shah tournaments were ?wired? so that they could communicate directly with the third umpire, as in rugby and American baseball.?In hockey, disputes over umpiring decisions mainly concern the penalty corner or, in the rare instance, as was the case last night, whether a goal was legitimate,? he said.
E-Mail this article to a friend
Rate This Article

Your opinion counts.
Rate this article or enter your comments below.

Opinions expressed here do not represent the official views of PlanetFieldHockey.com or its staff. Comments will be removed if they are considered offensive or of a personal nature.
Comments on this article
Edwin Odero
08-26-2003  3:45 am
Report this post
Third Umpire
I think by including third umpire the time of will be longer and the grounds for arguments willalso be open.I think we Umpires should not be carried away somtimes.The beauty of the Game lie on us we umpires.We should in most make accurate and proper judgemnts.These funny judgements being made by some umpires is what is calling' for third umpire.
Lookback at the Recent concluded Champions trophy,I donot want mention names but so many umpires in this tournament made funny decissions apart from ONLY one umpire who showed hisb class of good umpiring' and fitness. So Umpires let us puul our socks to avoid this third umpire scinario.
Enter your own Comments
Your Name:
Subject (Optional):
Your Comments:

These comments will not be posted live until they are reviewed

HOME | FEATURES | CLUBHOUSE | CAMPS | LINKS | ABOUT US | STORE | ADVERTISE
Use of this site is subject to certain Terms & Conditions.
Get our FREE Newsletter

  Search Articles
   
PFH Clubhouse Comment of the Week
MJWC: India: IHF official levels overage charges
By: Ankit Desai

Page Generation Time: 0.04 seconds...