HOME     |      FEATURES     |      CLUBHOUSE     |      CAMPS     |      LINKS     |      ABOUT US     |      STORE     |      ADVERTISE
PlanetFieldHockey.com Home  

Highlight articles
from the last
Coaching Articles
Measuring the Coach Fairly There are 4 comments on this articlex4
Planet Field Hockey
Planet Field Hockey
May 3, 2000 3.5 out of 5
Peter D'Cruz
> Page Views 6220

Off The Crossbar Article Series

The Women?s Pan Am U-21 World Cup qualifying tournament took place recently in Barbados. Canada?s team won the bronze medal, however in some circles there has been an uproar over the results achieved by the team. Before people storm the proverbial Bastille, the question that must be asked is ?what was the coaching staff expected to achieve??
At the professional levels of coaching in field hockey, i.e., any coach who is paid to coach, and in other sports, coaches and their staffs are the casualty when a team doesn?t get the ?results?. In amateur sports like field hockey, the various constituencies that have an interest in an elite club, state or national team have different agendas. These different, and usually hidden, agendas are used by people to determine whether a coach stays or is dismissed. This isn?t very fair to the coach and the organization?s members.

Coaches must be dealt with fairly, just as in the work place. Most coaches in field hockey report to a board, or a committee, which is responsible for the performance of the team. The board must require the coach to present a plan for the measurement period that includes performance objectives for the team. For example, the team will finish seventh at the Olympic tournament, or the team will win the gold medal. There are many other factors that must be taken into consideration including the budget to prepare the team, the quality of the athletes on the team, the quality of the preparation in comparison to other teams, etc.

For the coach to be measured fairly, both the coach and board must sign the document that defines the performance objectives. This mutual sign off demonstrates a shared responsibility for the team?s performance. Therefore, the results are not solely on the coach?s shoulders. The objectives must remain private and confidential during the measurement period. After the results are in, the objectives should be made public, so that all members of the organization can measure both the performance of the coach and the board who acts on their behalf. In some cases, it may be the board that should be dismissed.

I recently read news on the Internet that the presidents of the national field hockey associations in India and Pakistan have stated that their team will win the gold medal at the Sydney Olympics in the men?s section. The coaching staffs of eleven countries will fail at winning a gold medal. If all these coaches have met the objectives agreed upon by their national associations, then we can expect that they will discontinue in their professional capacities after the Olympics by their choosing only.

In my on-going business career, I expect to be measured by the annual business plan that has been approved by the board of directors of the company. If I coach again at the elite level, I am going to expect nothing less. I recommend that all coaches expect the same from their governing organizations.
E-Mail this article to a friend
Rate This Article

Your opinion counts.
Rate this article or enter your comments below.

Opinions expressed here do not represent the official views of PlanetFieldHockey.com or its staff. Comments will be removed if they are considered offensive or of a personal nature.
Comments on this article
Gail Timmer
01-05-2001  8:58 am
Report this post
coaches, just like all the rest of us in the real world, are accountable for their actions. we can not be satisfied with barely scraping into these tournaments and then finishing 2nd to last. If we are not getting results with the coaches and the teams they choose and the systems they teach, then let's look elsewhere. How much worse could we get!
player
01-05-2001  8:58 am
Report this post
I wholeheartedly agree. If a coach can't get better results from year to year or from cycle to cycle, there must be something wrong, either with the coach, or with the program. CHANGES MUST BE MADE! and people MUST be held accountable. Canada can't become complacent with achieving mediocre results.
English coach - Steve
03-07-2001  8:09 pm
Report this post
Coach education is exactly the same as for players! They can not be expected to look into the crystal ball and produce magic! The players have to use their regional coaches to assist their national coaching programme in our amatuer sport. If the coach fails the player - ok - go for them! The Coach at national level should have the people skills to deliver the skills, techniques and communication that is ness!
Chris Marriott
05-13-2002  7:30 am
Report this post
We must remember that measuring performance can only be done against targets that have been set correctly.
Specific
Measurable
Acheivable
Relevant
Time phased
Engaging
Reviewed

SMARTER.

If you get the targets wrong then how can you reach a meaningful eveluation.
Enter your own Comments
Your Name:
Subject (Optional):
Your Comments:

These comments will not be posted live until they are reviewed

HOME | FEATURES | CLUBHOUSE | CAMPS | LINKS | ABOUT US | STORE | ADVERTISE
Use of this site is subject to certain Terms & Conditions.
Get our FREE Newsletter

  Search Articles
   
PFH Clubhouse Comment of the Week
MJWC: India: IHF official levels overage charges
By: Ankit Desai

Page Generation Time: 0.06 seconds...