HOME     |      FEATURES     |      CLUBHOUSE     |      CAMPS     |      LINKS     |      ABOUT US     |      STORE     |      ADVERTISE
PlanetFieldHockey.com Home  

Highlight articles
from the last
Coaching Articles
An Introduction to the 3-3-3-1-1 Method of Play There are 13 comments on this articlex13
Planet Field Hockey
Planet Field Hockey
March 7, 2000 3.5 out of 5
Peter D'Cruz
> Page Views 22088

We encourage coaches to use this article as is or enhance it for their own team's application of the 3-3-3-1-1 system.

The 3-3-3-1-1 system is defined as the following:

3 Forwards LW CF RW
3 Links: LL CL RL
3 Defenders: LD CD RD
1 Sweeper SW
1 Goalkeeper GK


The 3-3-3-1-1 system provides for a lot of strength down the middle of the field as the diagram shows.  But, the real benefit of the system is that it allows a team to choose to be an attacking team for part of a game and or choose to be a defensive team in other parts of the game.

Attacking Play

The attack is based on good position play and the speed of the ball moving into the attacking half of the field.

The attack usually starts in our own half of the field, so the primary object of our Defenders and the Sweeper is to hit the ball wide to a winger or a Link.  Hitting the ball into the middle of the field is to be strongly discouraged because losing possession in our own half in the middle of the field will always give the opponent a very good attacking opportunity. So, HIT THE BALL OUT WIDE TOWARDS THE SIDELINE. 

The first task of the Links is to pass the ball quickly to the Forwards, preferably the wings, again stressing that we must attack down the sidelines.  A pass to the centre Forward near the 25-yard area is a very good pass to make as well.  If the Links cannot make a pass to one of the Forwards, the next option is a square pass to one of the other Links.  Finally, the Links must not try to run with the ball often

The two wingers have to STAY OUT WIDE NEAR THE SIDELINES as nearly all of our attacking passes are to be made out wide.  The wingers have to learn to be patient and be disciplined in their positioning.  When the winger receives a pass there are three options, (i) a cross pass to the centre Forward, (ii) a backward square pass to the closest Link and (iii) run with ball towards the opponent's goal. 

The Centre Forward will lead for passes from the wingers and will always get into the circle to take a shot on goal or to get a rebound.  The Centre Forward must be very aggressive about scoring goals and must try very hard even if the situation looks desperate.

Defensive Play

The three Forwards will apply full-court pressure on the ball even it is deep in the opponent's half. They must always harass the ball carrier and try to make a tackle.  Also, they must come back into our own half and face the ball whenever possible especially on free hits against us.

The Links will also apply full-court pressure on the ball carrier once the opponent has gone past our forwards.  Secondly, the links will come back well into our half and cover the opponent's mid-field players if they have created a successful attack into our half.

The two outside defenders pressure the opponent's wing forwards whenever the other team obtains possession of the ball.  Remember the ball could be fifty metres away but you must cover your winger.

The centre defender will cover the central area of the field where the opponent's centre forward could receive a pass whenever the other team gets the ball.

The Sweeper will intercept passes made by the opponent's forwards and will tackle any forward who has broken away from our defenders. The Sweeper must read the play properly and be very aggressive in intercepting the forwards or their passes.

When a defender has been beaten and the sweeper is coming up to tackle, the defender must sprint back to cover the space behind the sweeper.

The Goalkeeper

The goalkeeper does not only stop shots on goal but makes a contribution by:

  • making clearance kicks out to the side-lines and not into the middle of the field
  • calling out to the defenders and sweeper if any of the opponent's forwards are open

E-Mail this article to a friend
Rate This Article

Your opinion counts.
Rate this article or enter your comments below.

Opinions expressed here do not represent the official views of PlanetFieldHockey.com or its staff. Comments will be removed if they are considered offensive or of a personal nature.
Comments on this article
Edward Cole
02-20-2001  9:42 am
Report this post
Far too simplistic. I am looking for more thorough study. Many thanks
3-3-3-1-1 fan
03-08-2001  3:01 pm
Report this post
Personally, I am a big fan of this line-up. Our rep team used it in the 1998 BC Summer Games, and it worked quite effectively. Unfortunately, my coach in University is not too fond of this style of play.
Toni Watkins
04-09-2001  2:00 pm
Report this post
Thank you so much, very informative. Would you like to write one about the 4-3-2-1-1 system, I would love to read it or e-mail me...watkins_52@yahoo.com Thanks again, Toni
PJ
03-05-2004  5:27 pm
Report this post
3-3-3-1-GK
I don't like this system it is not a team game. Each players sole responsibility is to outperform "their man". I play in Ireland and this system is religiously applied regardless of who the best 10 outfield players are. The back and midfield 3 are only responsible for their man even if there is a more dangerous player nearby. One weak player particularly at the back or midfield will be a goldmine for the oppostion as they will have a free run until the sweeper confronts them, allowing them plenty of time to pick out their pass. Zonal marking sytems are much more defensively secure as you deal with the most dangerous possibilities first and worry about others if and when they arise.
PJ
Sloth
07-22-2004  1:32 pm
Report this post
systems
The phrase "systems" can throw the fear of the unknown into many players. I think it tries to make the game more complicated then it actually is. Each team puts out only 10 players (ignore the keeper because their role is pretty much defined). Those ten players have a certain role to perform when the team has possession and another role to perform when it doesn't. That is your strategy/system.

What can change in any game is the role that particular players are given to nullify or take advantage of an opposition player.

Lets face it if 2 teams line up with an entirely different formation (strategy) and 1 team is dominating possession then the other team will have to make changes ie redefine the roles of some players in an effort to restore the balance.

Effective defences will usually employ a combination of man-marking and zonal defense again defined in their roles.

Sloth
Kate
09-24-2004  6:45 pm
Report this post
3-3-3-1-1
I have been using this 3-3-3-1-1 system with my high school team, unfortuantely we are having trouble staying in there part of the field. I do not know if this is a major problem with this setup. Please send any advise to HBIC12@netscape.net
MP
10-02-2004  10:56 pm
Report this post
3-3-3-1-1-
Trying this system instead of 4-3-2-1--at a low level team. Our biggest Struggle is making pentration passes once forward gets it--if wing receives ball and CF goes for a through--it seems like she has to go alone--hard for midfield to join immediate attack-when I add that extra "forward" we have much more success in scoring and making progess in our half of field--any thoughts?
JT
10-20-2004  4:44 am
Report this post
3-3-3-1-1
If you are getting the ball down the right why dont you ask the right wing/forward to come in to form a partnership with the central striker. And vice versa if you are going down the left.
Corey
07-02-2005  12:06 am
Report this post
3-3-3-1-1
If the ball is always going to the sidelines, wouldn't that make the opposition's task easier by blocking out these areas? The attacking play seems too predictable.
Jb
07-08-2005  8:05 pm
Report this post
Other formations
Has anyone tried a 5-2-3 or a 5-3-2? The traditional 3-3-3-1 seems to be more of a defensive system and since most teams play it, you never have a numerical advantage on offense. Playing with five forwards and two center links gets more people into the attacking end thus creating more attacking opportunities, more corners and less pressure on your goalkeeper. The two outside half backs come up to support the wingers and become like links (these players and your wingers have to be very fit) leaving the only option for your opponent to play long passes to open space.
RW& Black
08-12-2005  2:38 am
Report this post
Re: Other Formations
I'm not sure where you are from, but in most hockey books (especially the grass texts) the traditional formation is a 5-3-2-GK

LW LI CF RI RW
LHB CHB RHB
FB FB
GK

This formation at first appears top-heavy, with the attack saturated. Most teams play the insides as 'link' players, primarily backup strikers and/or taggers. The half-backs are responsible for manning the three key forwards (wings and CF) and the insides normally tagging each other in defense. Most Australian teams still play this formation in my experience. It provides plenty of options in attack and allows good overlapping. I'm not sure how well it counters the other formations though.
We find it provides immense depth and width because the triangles formed allow a halfback to push into attack and be overlapped by an inside or fullback. It also allows good opportunities for backpassing.
This system does tend to struggle when teams play a 'flooding' game, as the circles can become very congested with the large numbers of forwards and defenders running around. It doesn't seem to work too well with a zonal defense either, but that could be the lack of knowledge on how to zone properly.
LJ
09-03-2005  2:13 pm
Report this post
Question about 3-3-3-1 formation
Do you believe in this formation for younger players (JV high school) playing on a grass field? I have always used a 4-2-3-1.
James
09-22-2005  10:21 am
Report this post
3-2-3-2-GK
what about a 3-2-3-2-GK that would work well as you have 2 sweepers at the back that cover everyone, effectively 4 wingers how work down the wings, with 2 players on each, a striker that pretty much goal hangs but as there are no offsides it would be to play him in and a holding midfielder and 2 attacking midfielders.
Enter your own Comments
Your Name:
Subject (Optional):
Your Comments:

These comments will not be posted live until they are reviewed

HOME | FEATURES | CLUBHOUSE | CAMPS | LINKS | ABOUT US | STORE | ADVERTISE
Use of this site is subject to certain Terms & Conditions.
Get our FREE Newsletter

  Search Articles
   
PFH Clubhouse Comment of the Week
MJWC: India: IHF official levels overage charges
By: Ankit Desai

Page Generation Time: 0.03 seconds...