Tue 13 May, 2008
|
|
|
|
International Hockey: Color your Shoes, or Else? x22
 |
| Robert Short |
September 12, 2001 
Robert Short
> Page Views 13636
Rotterdam – Since my return from the Men’s World Cup Qualifier in Scotland, I have had the pleasure of becoming a spectator once again enjoying the ever-so popular Women’s Champions Trophy here in Holland.
This was a great tournament with crowds on average of aproximately 6,000 people for the Dutch Team’s games. The Dutch made the final but lost 2-1 to the silver medallists of the Sydney Olympics, Argentina. There was a great atmosphere with large tents and booths selling equipment and food, while on the other five pitches at the Amsterdam club, kids camps were constantly ongoing. The atmosphere was similar to that of the 1998 World Cup in Utrecht.
Anyways, the reason for this article is due to an inconsistency that I noticed and had a hard time understanding. At the World Cup Qualifier there were a number of rules set for this particular tournament with promises of this being the way it would be for the future of World Hockey.
One was the movement of the push-out spot for the corners. For us, we had no idea going into this tournament that there would be a difference of a few feet in our corner push-outs. Maybe Canada was informed, but we as players and staff had heard nothing of the sort. I wonder what other teams didn’t have this rule-change prior to the Qualifier?
Now after watching the Champions Trophy I noticed that the spot for the push-out was still in the normal place. So why does this change from tournament to tournament? Is it different for the Women’s and the Men’s tournaments? The league here in Holland has the new lines painted on the spots but we still continue to use the normal push-out spots.
Another, inconsistency shown during our tournament in Scotland was the new rule of white tape not being allowed on our sticks. I assume this rule is there so the players, and as well the spectators, can see the ball on the players sticks, especially on the penalty corners. This makes sense but my problem with it was the fact that some teams did bide by this rule and some didn’t. We were told specifically to color our tape on our sticks, or use black tape. We as a team watched Lombi of Argentina play the whole tournament brilliantly with the whole front side of his stick taped with brilliant white tape. Maybe it was so noticeable due to him scoring nineteen goals. So, where is the consistency? Aren’t these sticks seen through the routine stick checks of each match? In the Champions Trophy I think they were enforcing this rule as I noticed the Dutch team all had bright yellow stick tape around their sticks.
The final one, and most ridiculous one, would be the new issue of ‘no white allowed on your shoes.’ At the Champions Trophy I know this was not used as many of the players were using the same shoes that players were made to color in at the Qualifier. Shoes such as the Gray’s, Dita’s, Mizuno’s, Kangaroo’s etc…. were all not allowed as is. We had players on our bench coloring in small corners of their shoes because they had a grey or white outside lining to the sole. This was a small annoyance for all of the teams so most teams complained. The reason given was that it was for television. The television at the Qualifier was a thirty-minute highlight package on the BBC shown after the tournament, while the Champions Trophy was on television every day. Most of the shoes looked worse colored than they did prior. One of our players had a gray stripe on his shoes and he was told 3 minutes before the whistle to start coloring. But, the funny part was we were playing New Zealand who had a number of players playing in gray running shoes. Japan was also another country that plays in gray shoes.
In golf, what has made the game so popular over the last five years? Tiger Woods! What has Tiger brought other than great golf? He has brought youth, fist pumps, nike shirts, and excitement. In athletics one of the most well known names is Micheal Johnson. What color shoes did he wear in the Olympics 5 years ago when he won a number of gold medals? Gold. Yes, there isn’t a white ball at the feet of these athletes, but this brings flair and excitement. Should ice hockey players paint their skates a color that doesn’t match the ice or the puck?
Field hockey players don’t make much money, if any, from their sport. Some hockey players get their playing shoes for free due to sponsorships, and now we are told we must color in our sponsors logos and stripes. Why would a company continue to sponsor hockey players around the world if their company is not recognizable on the shoes? I know Micheal Jordon wouldn’t still be sponsored by Nike if he wasn’t seen wearing the swoosh logo.
We as players face criticism at all times. Coaches and managers face criticism all the time. And the FIH must hear some criticism as well. Let’s keep the game fun and continue to better the game with better rules.

Your opinion counts. Rate this article or enter your comments below.
|
Opinions expressed here do not represent the official views of PlanetFieldHockey.com or its staff. Comments will be removed if they are considered offensive or of a personal nature.
Comments on this article
|
Jools
09-13-2001 3:49 am
|
Report this post
|
Absolutely right!!!
This shows that a great sport cannot reach the support (and I mean media here) it deserves because of stupid rules. People who watch hockey for the first time always ask me for some explanation...they give up after number 3 000 000, because there are too many rules, they even believe that ice hockey or even cricket are easier to understand...Instead of "thinking" of how to watch hockey better they should put more effort in media relation and communication, they should spend more money on sponsors and adverts in papers. They should just think...one thing they haven't actually done for the past...let me think...Too far away! No one could remember...Or maybe it's just me.
|
|
Marcel
09-13-2001 4:39 am
|
Report this post
|
agreement
Yes, this does sound like there are some problems. I read 'Jools' comments as well and agree with him on many of his points. Hockey does need to be promoted somehow. But, I do think that in some ways the FIH have made efforts to promote the sport. They area changing organization and are working to make hockey a bigger sport. These inconsistencies Robert Short has written about are ridiculous. Why waste time and energy on such petty things. Come on FIH focus on the real problems!
|
|
Plee34
09-13-2001 9:17 am
|
Report this post
|
ridiculous rules
Agreed with both comments. Think of it like this, what are the reprocussions for penalty of a rule. In the match if you commit a foot foul in the circle - the other team gets a corner - right. Mind you umpiring is subjective, but for the most part. SO, why then if it is a rule to have certain shoes, tape, etc. Why is it not enforced. Otherwise it shows it doesnt matter. (Honestly I also think it is trivial) But if you are telling one team or teams to abide and not others - that is not only unprofessional, it is wrong and makes the FIH look ridiculous with its lack of consistency. Get it right, keep it consistent, have a sanction for those who dont follow - you cannot be halfway about it all. It jeopardizes the integrity of the game!
GOOD ARTICLE!
|
|
Applebee's Army
09-13-2001 12:52 pm
|
Report this post
|
Michael Jordan
Well, someone has forgotten that one of Michael Jordan's original shoe (around 1983) was banned in 1984 because there was no white in it; all players had to have predominantly white or predominantly dark shoes at the time.
Of course, now Kobe Bryant has yellow sneaks, so that's another story altogether.
But you get the feeling that FIH will have to change its ways, given the fact that there are only a handful of specifically-built "field hockey shoes" in the world. Many use either runners, cross-trainers, tennis, or racquetball shoes.
Some, in the US, use American football cleats on the bumpy grass fields.
The FIH must -- MUST -- keep current with the shoe companies. Otherwise they run the risk of being out of step.
|
|
ffih
09-13-2001 8:14 pm
|
Report this post
|
inadequacies
hi there
agree with you.
FIH needs to look at the big picture - make the game more attractive to spectators and players but still not allowing ludicrous rule changes such as scoring anywhere from inside the 25.
Also ignore the small petty things like the shoes, sticks colour - if this is the case then teams shouldn't play with white playing shirts - imagine the irate germans.
just on the mens WCQ - the officials couldn't even organise the draw properly but still found the time/energy to make players change the colour of the shoes. Not much needs to be said of the criteria for choosing teams for the WCQ here (ie Zimbabwe, Chile etc).
all im trying to say is that the FIH needs to wake up and look at the big issues.
|
|
Andrew McManus
09-16-2001 6:04 pm
|
Report this post
|
|
It seem that the FIH has introduced a ruling without forethought, planning or considering the effects of their actions. Surely a rule is 2 ensure the good flow of the gme and make sure no-one gains advantage by illict means. How does wearing white shoes go against the spirt of hockey in the same way as kicking the ball or hitting an opponent? Continuing in this vein, what is suitable punishment for wearing a white shoe? Must the player play barefoot, or sit the entire game on the sidelines, or do the opposition get a 1 goal advantage at the start of the match? How can a rule of this ilk ever be of prctical benifit to the hockey playing and watching public? The body blow however is the conempt which umpires must hold the rule in, for them to apply it so sporadically. THis undermines an weakens an already unnecessary and foolhardy descision. The FIH should wake up and realise that hockey needs useful critical input, NOT mindless bureaucracy designed to turn people away from the game. I myself would not play in shoes which an umpire ordered me 2 colour in, especially at the price for a good pair of astro boots!
|
|
|
|
Lester
09-18-2001 3:49 am
|
Report this post
|
Fih
Can all this really be true? FIH are suppossed to be promoting the game!!!!
|
|
Fred Delay
09-18-2001 8:46 am
|
Report this post
|
The rules of FIH
I'm 100% Ok with the stupidity of changing the rules every week by FIH. When you see what happened at Edinburgh with the penalty-stroke given by Belgium the second week; strictly the same way: first time was good, but second time not good because of dragging. The belgian player doesn't understand what the referee explain him ON THE PITCH (!!!)about that dragging. The communication of the rules doesn't arrive to the players and those rules are so not respected. I think that we need a good communication, and not so many changes of rules. That's a job for FIH;;;
|
|
Qanika
09-18-2001 10:38 am
|
Report this post
|
It should be stated I think that the problems at the WCQ mostly arose from the TD's personal interpretation of the FIH rules, NOT the rules themselves.
The biggest problem though was that he kept changing his mind, one day pronouncing a pair of shoes put on his very desk to be perfectly ok, the next day asking the very same pair of shoes to be colored...
|
|
Adam Staines
09-19-2001 7:27 am
|
Report this post
|
I'd like to disagree with qanika
To be fair to the TD at the world cup qualifier, he was trying to enforce an unclear guideline (I dont think qanika liked him very much). The main reason the womens champions trophey was better is because of the problems from the mens qualifier. The FIH need to specify how much white/grey is allowed, then we wouldn't have a problem. Personally I think logo's and stripes are fine its just white shoes and ones with large white souls that are a problem. FIH pull your finger out.....
|
|
Qanika
09-19-2001 8:43 am
|
Report this post
|
"Specify how much white/grey is allowed" - any suggestions on how to do that (in square mm maybe...)? Don't you think that maybe the rules were deliberately created the way they are to allow for logos?
But apart from that I keep wondering why it is only the WCQ TD who has problems with this "unclear" guideline, when no other TD seems to have any. And yes, you're quite right, I didn't like the TD, but I want to stress that that had nothing to do with him personally, but with his style of work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
hockeyer
09-23-2001 4:14 am
|
Report this post
|
|
more articles form shorty needed!!!!!!
|
|
Greg
09-23-2001 9:51 am
|
Report this post
|
|
Ehi! what about changing ball coulor instead of tape and shoes like in indoor matches?
|
|
rookie
11-08-2001 9:41 am
|
Report this post
|
Shoe rules
The 2000 Americas Cup held in la Havana Cuba use the rule of the no white allowed under the knees,so everybody including myself painted our shoes to another color. Now, shoe manufacture should know this and use colors like red, blue, orange,black even purple and will add some color to our game. And do somebody know were the transmitte those games, never see them on TV, probably in EU but not in American hemisphere.
|
|
Jolly
11-18-2001 8:40 pm
|
Report this post
|
Rules, rules and more rules!!!!!
How do you expect the FIH to get their dress regulations correct if they can not decide on the rules of the game!! This is exactly the type of "confusion" that is not allowing our game to settle and progress. I am getting a bit tired of explaining and justifying these continuous rule changes to the team I coach. The sport is getting more and more expensive and will be out of reach of the majority if we are not careful.
|
|
Bethan
01-16-2002 8:49 am
|
Report this post
|
Complety agree - i play for the welsh u16 and we weren't allowed white wshoes - i know i am going to have to dye my one this year
Also we were told bandaner couldn't be worn over our head only like a band and in hamburg we were stoped from wearing them as we were. But i was watching the champions trophy in holland and th japan were wearing them as we had been with no promblem
The rules if they are going to stand need to be the same for all tournements and also if white isn't allowed why produce the shoes i have in only white?????
|
|
timagen pope
05-17-2002 9:17 am
|
Report this post
|
jordans shoe
i would like to know the color of the shoe that was banned in 1983 by the NBA
|
|
treaj
10-17-2002 10:04 am
|
Report this post
|
the flip / flopping of the rules
It is unfortunate that we as players have to be subjected to the seemingly pure hearted powers that be, attempts at making the game
more attractive , safe and dynamic .
I have been playing well over 10 yrs. and to tell u i have no idea of some of these rules that were there originally , much more the new rules which have been implemented, adjusted or tweeked. We soon will have to be like NFL players with constant briefing about rules carrying around a clip folder with rules as they do the plays in thier play book.
As for the need to make it more attractive , they make the rules to help the beauty of the game but remember these changes confuse and ultimately disuade new and even old spectators to the sport .
No change will ever make the game perfect but it will make it hard for
the players we depend on to show their skills and talent and the team whose methods and their tactics give the game the attractiveness they
are requiring.
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
HOME | FEATURES | CLUBHOUSE | CAMPS | LINKS | ABOUT US | STORE | ADVERTISE
Use of this site is subject to certain Terms & Conditions.
|
|
|