HOME     |      FEATURES     |      CLUBHOUSE     |      CAMPS     |      LINKS     |      ABOUT US     |      STORE     |      ADVERTISE
PlanetFieldHockey.com Home  

Highlight articles
from the last
Health & Fitness Training
Articles in this series
1. Health and Fitness: Resistance Training: Sport SpecificityThere are 10 comments on this articlex10
2. Explosive / Speed TrainingThere are 16 comments on this articlex16
Explosive / Speed Training There are 16 comments on this articlex16
Certification for Active Minds
Certification for Active Minds
July 9, 2001 4 out of 5
International Association of Resistance Trainers
> Page Views 27430

by Brian D. Johnston

For the past few years, speed training has become the new rave within the fitness industry; neatly fitting into the periodization model for supposed optimum conditioning.  Whether you’re talking about speed training explosive training, the concept is to moving or accelerating the resistance as quickly as possible.  Questions remaining include: 1) Will moving quickly develop quicker muscles? 2) Will moving quickly produce better results, i.e., ability to mover faster, than moving slowly? 3) Is it safe to move quickly?

Quicker Muscles
Consider that some authorities whom promote speed training also contend slow movement (e.g., 3-4 second concentric or slower) makes you slow, or at least will not improve speed.  There are several problems with this reasoning, some of which were addressed previously but deserve reiteration. 

Primarily, it is force that enables you to move faster.  Simply try to move faster without exerting greater force.  If you discover a method to the contrary, share it with the automobile industry and become wealthy.  Now consider elementary physics – that moving a resistance from point A to B (distance) requires force and a magnitude of time to complete the lift.  Add it all together and you have the prescription for power, which is force x distance ÷ time, or the rate of doing work.  

By increasing force (i.e., muscle strength), and not speed, you become more powerful and faster.  Speed is merely the result of force. As Isaac Asimov stated in his book, Understanding Physics, “a force is that which can impose a change of velocity on a material body; (a force is) that which imposes a change in speed of a body, or its direction of motion, or both; without a continuous force, there would be no continuous acceleration.” 

It is a fact that a stronger athlete (relative to his or her own previous ability) is a more powerful and faster athlete, but within reason and limitations.  Those who compete with light implements, i.e., tennis or Ping-Pong players, increase speed of their swing and delivery by skill practicing, mental focus, and drills to increase reaction time.  Exerting against a light implement such as a racquet, air resistance, and a ball cannot provide sufficient opposing force (Newton’s Third Law) to allow greater muscular force up to a certain limitation... no matter how strong you become.  Athletes who do require high speeds against low resistance are at the mercy of their reflexes or nervous reactions (factors that are genetically predetermined), as well as their volitional effort and focus.  Speed weight training will NOT help.

Next, consider the idea that regardless of how fast you move a resistance, it is nowhere near the potential speed that is possible.  For example, a rapidly moving barbell (e.g., 50+% of your 1RM) may travel at 200° per second – perhaps a bit faster.  However, a sprinter’s limbs, unobstructed by a resistance (excluding gravity, ground friction, and air), can move and accelerate several times faster. 

How can a slower speed, while using resistance, increase the speed capability of muscles that contract much faster and under 90ms – especially considering one ‘pro-speed’ argument is that moving slowly in weight training will not build speed and that you must move quickly?  If lighter resistance is more specific to increasing maximal speed, as so many coaches advocate, then why not train with air resistance for maximal speed development?  Conversely, if some resistance is necessary, it should be evident the importance of muscular overloading of the weight to build strength/force to then develop greater speed with the speed of movement during exercise being irrelevant.

Realize that the speed you demonstrate power is specific and dependent on the sporting activity or movement.  The speed of movement at which you build power, however, is unrelated and independent of the speed you demonstrate power.  If you play a particular sport requiring fast movement, you should attempt to move quickly when practicing the particular sporting skills, thus demonstrating power, but not when exercising to build power.

Better Results
If you consider the reasoning above, fast movement is not superior to slower movement in producing quick muscles, power or explosion.  Moreover, the faster you move, the greater the acceleration and momentum.  That means a quick blast out of the starting gates resulting in high forces at the commencement of movement.  What follows (if not injury) is muscular unloading for part of the range of motion as the resistance propels upward and until gravity slows the weight down.  How can muscular unloading be beneficial if the concept of strength training is to train (not relax) the muscles? 

Also, what mechanically transpires during fast movement that does NOT transpire during slow movement?  Speed proponents are unable to respond rationally, often substituting mystical terminology, gut hunches, beliefs, and hypotheses for fact.  Muscles contract –  period.  Whether you move quickly or slowly, their job is to generate or resist force (resisting force via contraction), regardless of speed.  And, as stated, it is force that produces speed and acceleration.

Safety
The faster you move the greater the risk of injury.  Moving a light weight explosively is just as dangerous as moving a 1RM slowly (although you  may be producing maximum force to move it as quickly as possible).  Speed proponents, at least, concur that there remains risk of injury during explosive movement. 

Exercise, however, should not increase any risk, but should increase functional ability to prevent injuries.  It is understandable that Olympic lifters and powerlifters run the risk due to high forces of lifting a 1RM, but that should not apply to the rest of the population.  Many professional athletes have injured themselves from high-speed training, and they are genetic superiors who can better sustain such rigors.  If they run the risk of injury, what does that indicate about the norm?

***  ***

Brian D. Johnston is the President of the International Association of Resistance Trainers (I.A.R.T.), providing certification and education resources for personal trainers, coaches, and athletes.  His website is
www.ExerciseCertification.com, where you will find dozens of free articles on exercise and nutrition science, including several on proper coaching practices for athletes.  Don’t forget to visit the learning resources section and pick up a book or video.  We have plenty of excerpts from each volume so you can ‘test the waters’ before buying.


E-Mail this article to a friend
Rate This Article

Your opinion counts.
Rate this article or enter your comments below.

Opinions expressed here do not represent the official views of PlanetFieldHockey.com or its staff. Comments will be removed if they are considered offensive or of a personal nature.
Comments on this article
Dave Wilson
07-10-2001  12:59 am
Report this post
Excellent
This is stuff is great. This is the kind of information that players and coaches need. I hope this is more to come. I recommend people check out Brian's webseite.
D.Hansen
07-10-2001  10:25 pm
Report this post
Max. Strength vs. Speed
I think people may misinterpret the message being conveyed in this article. The terms 'slow' and 'fast', as well as 'speed' are used very loosely in this article. While lifting velocities in Olympic lifting are relatively 'slow' compared to the 100m sprinting stride, they are still very dynamic. I would hesitate to classify them as slow. If you have ever witnessed World Class lifting in person, you wouldn't be apt to refer to this activity as slow.

Olympic lifting and maximal speed sprinting are entirely different movements, and should not be compared directly. If we look at the 100m, Olympic lifting assists primarily in acceleration from zero to 20m, as the athlete accelerates from a static start. This contribution of Olympic lifting is demonstrated by the sprint results of Olympic lifters and world class throwers (shot, discus, hammer). Some of these athletes can run as fast as many of the top 100m sprinters over 20m. Of course, after 20m, the big boys fall over because they do not work maximal speed sprinting - they don't need to.

Athletes who want to develop good acceleration qualities (0-30m), as well as maximum speed capabilities (30-60m), need to work in both the weight room and on the track. Nobody is disputing the fact that muscles contract forcefully throughout a sprint. Just ask any world class sprinter who's blown a hamstring in the middle of a race. However, specificity dictates that we work the individual components of max. strength, explosive power and maximum speed in parallel, so that our athletes benefit from all of these movements, without sacrificing any one individual component.

I would be curious to know whether the author has worked with any world class sprinters or olympic lifters.
Chris
09-27-2001  1:05 pm
Report this post
Sprinting
As a competitive sprinter (now retired)
I have to make a couple of comments.
explosive Weight training is definitely beneficial to power and speed. By training explosively (especially Oylmpic style lifting, power cleans, plyometrics etc) you are recruiting more muscle fiber and teaching your nervous system better than through sprinting alone. It also increases tendon and ligament strength which greatly reduces the chances of injury. Done properly you can not only see an improvement in your overall speed but in your consistency as well. (Maintaining good form and speed through rounds of heats.)
It is an absolutely NECESSARY part of explosive sprint training.
Chris
Ray Boe
01-21-2002  11:42 pm
Report this post
Muscle Type Involved in movement
I wonder if Dr. Brian Johnston has looked into which muscle fiber is involved in the "slow" resistance movement and which would be invovled in the "fast" movement. I believe the intent of the "fast" is to recruit more white quick twitch fibers into development as opposed to bigger slower red muscle fibers. Is there any studies indicating either way if white fibers are more involved in quick movement trainning?
Peter Katchmer
03-15-2002  12:40 pm
Report this post
Strong muscles and tendons can be built through weight training at ANY speed or tempo, fast or slow. However, the greatest impedement to growing large and forcefull bodies is to injure it. Explosive training is extraordinarily injurious to joints and muscles, and is completely unneccesary for developing an athlete in the preseason due to the equal viability of less injurious, slower weight-training. It is also my beleif that for sprinters, explosive sprint training should only be begun after a VERY extensive weight training base (i.e. developing one's squat to atleast 150% of their bodyweight along with other lifts in proper proportion). As for muscle type recruitment, this is
nonsense; muscle recruitmenty of fast twitch fibers are recruited in almost any short-duration weight lifts, hence the bodies ability to build muscle whether with 20 reps or 1 rep.
Bianca
06-03-2002  10:22 pm
Report this post
I'm a younge hockey player who is working my way up to become a hockeyroos player, and this article was a great read. Thanks
Tom
06-07-2002  4:39 pm
Report this post
Excellent Article
I totally agree with the comments made by the author and have yet to read an article that provides a good logical argument for why the pros of “explosive training” out way its cons. The only argument given is that Olympic lifters seem to be able to run very fast. Well hey that is a surprise! These top athletes are phenomenal physical specimens who just happened to choose Olympic weight lifting to compete at. Maybe if they had decided to turn their skills to sprinting they may have been equally successful?

I have used non-explosive techniques (HIT/Abbreviated Training once a week) for 2 years now with phenomenal results. Although I do not practice sprinting my 100m dash has improved by 2.5 seconds (from 15 to 12.5) over the last year (intermural sports day) and my resting heart rate dropped from 62 bpm to 51 (and still at a healthy blood pressure). In this time my fellow student friends who all use explosive techniques (advocated by my University) have simply become injured or made marginal gains.

If training slow does not increase your fast twitch fibre recruitment they why have I become faster – surely I should have stayed the same or got slower (my bodyweight has gone up 20Kg). I am no exercise expert, but as a University Graduate I know to be wary of information sources. Make up your own mind.
badman from uk
10-16-2003  10:30 am
Report this post
speed and weights
as an athlete( 200m and 400m) i dont believe in pushing weights ive been doing athletics for 2 years and i have not touched a single weight. what i do is circuits which consists of squats, press ups , sit ups , drills ,plyometrics, my body weight only increased by half a stone 10.5 to 11 but i feel much physically stronger when i first started out. after the fisrt season i ran 24.2 seconds in the 200m after the my second season i ran 21.9 which is a vast improvement, all done without touching weights, but if weights will improve what what im doing now ill hit the gym straight away.kim collins does not do weights ,he evn said it himself, now hes world champion 2003
bossman
10-20-2003  11:03 am
Report this post
article is wack, straight up
kram
09-21-2004  1:50 pm
Report this post
fa shizzle
Keith
09-25-2004  10:00 pm
Report this post
40-time
I was wondering what specific advice there is about improving times in the forty yard dash. i am 5'7'' 120 lbs, and can run it in about 4.7, how can I improve? Does it matter which foot i take off with?

Thanks.
Mike
09-30-2004  1:50 pm
Report this post
I've read several articles on this subject and what jumps (pun intended) out at me is the articles that are in favor of explosive training site research, but this article and others like it only try to rationalize why explosive training isn't right. I'll go with the research.
Andy
10-11-2004  5:17 am
Report this post
Really helpful
LAURA REYNOLDS IS A COW AND TELLS EVERY 1 HOW TO SPELL STUFF. THIS SITE HAS HELPED ALOT IN OUR GCSE PE HOMEWORK. THANK YOU
Tess
11-11-2004  6:00 pm
Report this post
This article, although some of the comments arn't necessary, was well written and very helpful.
Thankyou.
feras farag
01-16-2005  2:46 pm
Report this post
power or .......???
to decrease the gap between the record for 100-m and 200-m sprinting
is the reson ( speed endurance or power or power-endurance )
snow
01-26-2005  10:51 am
Report this post
good report!!
u
Enter your own Comments
Your Name:
Subject (Optional):
Your Comments:

These comments will not be posted live until they are reviewed

HOME | FEATURES | CLUBHOUSE | CAMPS | LINKS | ABOUT US | STORE | ADVERTISE
Use of this site is subject to certain Terms & Conditions.
Get our FREE Newsletter

  Search Articles
   
PFH Clubhouse Comment of the Week
MJWC: India: IHF official levels overage charges
By: Ankit Desai

Page Generation Time: 0.18 seconds.