HOME     |      FEATURES     |      CLUBHOUSE     |      CAMPS     |      LINKS     |      ABOUT US     |      STORE     |      ADVERTISE
PlanetFieldHockey.com Home  

Highlight articles
from the last
International Europe Great Britain
Great Britain: Hockey's infighting a blow to Coe's bid There are 9 comments on this articlex9
Great Britain
Great Britain
February 12, 2005 3.5 out of 5
Scotland on Sunday, UK
> Page Views 2037

AS THE International Olympic Committee prepare to pay their visit to London this week to assess the British bid for the 2012 Olympic Games, at least one featured sport is in turmoil behind the scenes.

The organisational woes of British hockey are threatening to cast an additional shadow on the credibility of Sebastian Coe’s efforts to bring the Games to Britain for the first time in half a century.

Stunned by the inexorably rising costs of winning Olympic medals, Sport England announced that they would cut funding to those sports deemed to have been failures in the past, or unlikely to be successful in the future.

Their spending programme for the next four years will see an increase from £215m to more than £300m, with 27 medal-winning sports, ranging from badminton to canoeing, receiving more money. In contrast, despite high-profile medal-winners such as Denise Lewis and Kelly Holmes, athletics is deemed to have disappointed at Athens and, with gymnastics, karate and particularly hockey, will get less support from the public purse.

England Hockey’s funding, which will decrease from £3.5m to £2.75m next year, has been described variously as a 40% or a 60% cut. But it is 21%, and English hockey will still have more than £11m to spend over the next four years.

Roger Draper, Sport England’s chief executive, says the cuts are a direct reflection on performance in Athens, and is insisting on the "primacy of GB" over the home countries.

But England Hockey last week dissembled more misleading figures, claiming that hockey players in Scotland would receive up to seven times more money per head than English counterparts - nonsensical statistics.

Such bleating is unlikely to impress at least one delegate with the IOC evaluation committee.

Els van Breda Vriesland, president of the International Hockey Federation, is well aware of the wrangling going on. And she knows that, if London is to stage the Games in seven years, GB will have automatic qualification for the hockey tournament, as hosts.

Roger Self, new president of the British Olympic Hockey Board, has written to Simon Clegg, chief executive of the British Olympic Association, to express regret at "the many who seek to influence who have not considered all the relevant facts". Clegg’s comments on the refusal of Self’s board to allow GB to supplant the home countries in the hockey World Cup stopped short of a threat to withdraw the teams from the Beijing Olympics. But his impatience was clear.

However, Self - the gold medal-winning coach in Seoul - has just completed a detailed four-month review of the sport. He has confirmed the need for England to have "unfettered rights" to represent GB in the Olympic qualification process, but also acknowledged the considerable advantages of allowing additional players from England, Scotland and Wales to gain high-level experience in the World Cup tournaments.

Self has invited the BOA to sit down with the hockey board to thrash out a co-ordinated approach to delivering elite hockey, rather than conducting warfare in the media.

But it may be too late to convince Vriesland to vote for London 2012.
E-Mail this article to a friend
Rate This Article

Your opinion counts.
Rate this article or enter your comments below.

Opinions expressed here do not represent the official views of PlanetFieldHockey.com or its staff. Comments will be removed if they are considered offensive or of a personal nature.
Comments on this article
dutchman
02-15-2005  3:32 am
Report this post
facts
the fih president is els van breda VRIESMAN and roger self was NOT GB coach in 1988 - david whiraker was. typical scots, anything for a good story!
Scottish International
02-15-2005  7:47 am
Report this post
Confused
RE: England to have " unfettered rights " to represrnt GB in the Olympic qualification process. Does that mean that no Scottish or Welsh athlete will be considered or allowed to represent GB until after the Olympic qualification tournament?
DW Fan
02-15-2005  7:48 am
Report this post
Correction
David Whittaker was the coach of the 1988 GB team, Roger Self was the manager.
Kermit the Frog
02-16-2005  4:57 am
Report this post
Paris is a much nicer city anyway
Cymraes
02-18-2005  4:21 pm
Report this post
in general.......
C'mon Moscow! Hope London dosent get it! Dont think it will work here, for all the hypocracy thats going on! £11000000 for four years! Shouldnt England be doing slightly better with all that money going arround!
GB DID underperform in the Olympics and it's totally just that there will be funding cuts! The only way out is to proove the BOA or whoever it is that sorts these things out they GB DO DESERVE more money, and the only way to doing that is to get back to winning ways! Lets be a little more proffesionnal guys (and Gals!)!
peanut
02-18-2005  4:54 pm
Report this post
scottish international
not quite.
It was decided a few years ago that one home country must be nominated to qualify gb for the olympics. As england is the highest rated team they are always nominated.
that means that if england win the european cup, gb will qualify for the olympics automatically and if they come in the top5 (i think this number is right) they get into the olympic qualifier which gb would then go to.
Charles
04-08-2005  1:53 pm
Report this post
Why do I have to be represented at the Olympics by a country that is not my own i.e. GB? Ultimately I am ENGLISH and NOT British. Seeing that it is my nation that assures qualification for the Olympics, why can it not be my nation represented at the Olympics? I am fine that the Scots and the Welsh have their own identities and federations, but much as they want/choose to be seperate from us when it suites them, they must understand that the feeling is in fact mutual. Or is it just that they would never qualify for an Olympics anyway....?
Oh Charlie
04-10-2005  2:12 pm
Report this post
I am english blah blah blah every other sport manages to get on fine and all come under the UNITED banner of GB for the Olympics why should hockey be any different so much in house politics and waste of time procrastinating surely the best team of players regardless whether they are english,welsh or heaven forbid scottish should make up the squad if we are ever going to recover some respect interms of world hockey.
Scottish-American
07-06-2005  10:35 am
Report this post
London to Host 2012 Olympics
It is hard to avoid infighting, jealosy, etc when 3 countries combine into 1, with only one team qualifying. But I am estactic that London will be hosting in 2012. All the more reason to give ALL sports the money they need to give a class performance every year with the goal of winning as many gold medals as possible in 2012. I know I will be there to watch. After all, if it were not for the Brits, there would be no world wide hockey, especially in the US. We are always greatful for Constance Appleby from the New Forest & all the other Brits, Welsh, etc. who have come over & taught us to play & love hockey. Lastly I want to say, after Chirac's rude comments about British food, I am VERY GLAD Paris did not get the 2012 Olympics!! Give him Haggis the entire time he's in Scotland!
PS. You guys can keep George Bush while he's over there! Feed him to Nessie!!
Enter your own Comments
Your Name:
Subject (Optional):
Your Comments:

These comments will not be posted live until they are reviewed

HOME | FEATURES | CLUBHOUSE | CAMPS | LINKS | ABOUT US | STORE | ADVERTISE
Use of this site is subject to certain Terms & Conditions.
Get our FREE Newsletter

  Search Articles
   
PFH Clubhouse Comment of the Week
MJWC: India: IHF official levels overage charges
By: Ankit Desai

Page Generation Time: 0.18 seconds.