HOME     |      FEATURES     |      CLUBHOUSE     |      CAMPS     |      LINKS     |      ABOUT US     |      STORE     |      ADVERTISE
PlanetFieldHockey.com Home  

Highlight articles
from the last
International Europe Malta
Malta: Three teams at the top There are 16 comments on this articlex16
HAM
HAM
January 21, 2005 2.5 out of 5
Times of Malta
> Page Views 1412

The Blue Label National League resumed on Sunday after an extended Christmas break.

The Hunters' Tower Rest. ended their first round commitments with a 2-0 victory over Poiatti Qormi while Sliema Hotsticks continued their good start with a 2-1 success over White Hart.

Following these results, the Hunters' Tower and Sliema Hs joined Rabat on the seven-point mark with Young Stars having played a game more.

Rabat and Sliema complete their first round commitments on Sunday when they face off in an intriguing clash.

Poiatti Qormi 0
The Hunters' Tower Rest. 2
Poiatti Qormi had three players missing for this match, namely the Chircop brothers and Reno Bianchi but welcomed back in the fray ex-Young Stars player Chris Bugeja who returned to action after knee surgery.

Young Stars started the game on top, dominating every area of the field and also possession of the ball. This pressure resulted in a number of short corners and the Poiatti rearguard finally gave in when from a short corner move, Young Stars took the lead after a weak hit by Chris Attard crossed the line.

After this early goal, the tempo of the game dropped with Qormi now giving a better account of themselves.

The second half was a different story as Poiatti did their utmost to get back into the game. The Greens dominated most of the possession but still did not create enough chances to threaten their opponents' goal.

However, on one occasion, Bugeja stole the ball from the Floriana defence and as he was approaching the dee, a defender hooked his stick and denied him a clear chance on goal.

As the foul started outside the area, the umpire opted to award a short corner and temporarily dismissed the Young Stars defender.

The Poiatti players felt hard done by this decision and to compound matters, after Bugeja missed a good chance, a penalty stroke was awarded at the other end.

After the inevitable protests, Charles Micallef stepped up and made it 2-0 to seal the result.

The Qormi players once again left the field frustrated as another controversial incident had gone against them.

Umpires: M. Imbroll, R. Cremona.

Sliema Hotsticks 2
White Hart 1
Sliema Hotsticks made it back-to-back victories in the league, having the better of White Hart 2-1 to condemn the latter to their third consecutive defeat.

The game was an interesting affair with both sides playing some good hockey. Sliema, although not setting any houses on fire, have shown improvement from the poor performances in the Challenge Cup.

White Hart have displayed a commendable attitude in going for an open game but the lack of experience of most of their players remains their chief weakness.

Sliema were without the suspended Baldacchino and the injured Scicluna but White Hart were at full strength.

They saw more of the action early on but failed to capitalise as White Hart got into the game, although on many occasions they left Busutill Leaver ploughing a lone furrow up front.

White Hart were dangerous from short corners while Sliema's moves down the right wing were always causing problem.

A good move down this channel led to the opening goal as Shawn Mifsud rounded off from close range.

Sliema seemed to be in control but a clumsy tackle from their veteran captain Henry Cachia led to White Hart being awarded a penalty, which Busutill Leaver converted.

Five minutes into the second half, Sliema scored what was to be the winning goal. Another move along the right flank saw the active Steve Cachia serving Pace who beat Galea with a first-time rising slap shot.

This time round, White Hart could not come back and despite their efforts they were found wanting in front of goal.

On their part, Sliema, with Bezzina, Imbroll and Caruana Smith pulling the strings in midfield, had plenty of chances to put the game beyond White Hart.

Umpires: R. Aquilina, R. Micallef.
E-Mail this article to a friend
Rate This Article

Your opinion counts.
Rate this article or enter your comments below.

Opinions expressed here do not represent the official views of PlanetFieldHockey.com or its staff. Comments will be removed if they are considered offensive or of a personal nature.
Comments on this article
What News?
01-25-2005  9:42 am
Report this post
Can someone tell us if this was the right decision? quote "As the foul started outside the area, the umpire opted to award a short corner and temporarily dismissed the Young Stars defender"
Henry Cachia
01-26-2005  2:05 am
Report this post
Once the foul was outside the dee, the umpire cannot award a penalty. What card to show to the defender is a matter for the umpire to decide. Remember that in hockey there is no rule that specifically states that a player is to be sent off if he stops a clear goal scoring opportunity (as in football). Any other comments?
Anthony Tabone
01-26-2005  5:40 am
Report this post
If that is how it was; then it was the right decision all the way.

Cheers
Ramon
01-26-2005  9:40 am
Report this post
I have heard the opinions of several umpires here in Malta and also from abroad and they have all told me that it is NOT true that if the foul started outside the dee, an umpire cannot award a penalty stroke. The foul started outside the dee but both players kept on moving for several yards until they entered the dee with both sticks hooked together. Once inside the dee, Chris' attempt to hit was impeded by the defender's stick which was still hooked to his and it was at that time that the game was stopped by the umpire's whistle.

I also find it a bit strange that the report is trying to justify an umpire's decision especially in this case where according to many, the umpire was wrong. In my opinion, it should be left to everyone's own discretion to decide whether it should have been a penalty stroke or not as we all see things in a different way.
What News?
01-26-2005  10:14 am
Report this post
Dear Henry, but you said "it started" and did not specify were did it end!
Henry Cachia
01-27-2005  12:40 am
Report this post
The report is no attempt to justify what the umpire did. If I had to write down all the versions that i heard of the incident i would have gone on for ever. I still think that the crux of the problem is were did the foul start. My opinion is that if it started outside the dee then no penalty should be given but i am no expert.
What News?
02-01-2005  3:54 am
Report this post
Henry Cachia
"The report is no attempt to justify what the umpire did" What do you think we are????? morons???
Henry Cachia
02-01-2005  1:56 pm
Report this post
Yes if you can't show your name.
Dave Evans
02-04-2005  2:22 am
Report this post
morons
I am not commenting on the incident, as 1) i was at the other end of the pitch so couldn't see it clearly, and 2) there are enough experts on the subject

But what I want to say is that I do not think Henry's report, or his comments, are biased.

+ he gets full points for style for his last comment ;)
What News?
02-07-2005  4:09 am
Report this post
Dave Evans
Very Well said Dave! Until it suited you that a probable penalty stroke wasn't awarded then its OK. It is a contrast from the reactions we use to get from your club when we were made to think that all umpires want to destroy YS, especially Imbroll, who was fiercely attached personally on this same site. Now you don't even care that a wrong decision was "officialised" by his teammate the acting PRO of the Hockey Association. You are right on one thing that I must show my identity, but that is part of my fun! And you are free to criticise it as much as I am free to keep anonymous.
James Mizzi
02-07-2005  10:04 am
Report this post
What News
Dear What News,

I just hope you keep on having fun!!

As they say, 'simple things, please simple minds'

cya all

James
No News
02-08-2005  6:26 am
Report this post
James Mizzi
Wow! I'm impressed!! but it goes something like this "little things please little minds"
James Mizzi
02-08-2005  9:01 am
Report this post
What News...No News - Who can tell the difference!!!!
Glad you got that...... however, what I ment was exactly.......... "SIMPLE things please SIMPLE minds" maybe you'll get it this time round since you decided to reply to such a simple comment!!

Keep on having fun:)

ha ha!!

enjoy

James
Same s***
02-08-2005  12:52 pm
Report this post
What news - are you by any chance upset about the fact that you weren't awarded the penatly stroke in question and thus hindering your scoring frenzy... as always!!!
Jerry Springer
03-10-2005  5:38 am
Report this post
You gusy are so much fun to read. some people criticize, some people offend and other criticize the ampires.

Hell, at the end of the day, it’s just a game. A game that ends after 70mins and there is nothing you can do about it. An umpire in Malta always try’s to do his best, hell I should know for sure.

Some people get offended by verbal aggressive words by there own friends which is absolutely stupid. But what can you do about it….NOTHING.

So people…just enjoy the game you love, and let the umpires get on with it.
Chris Mintoff (Achilles)
04-29-2005  5:41 pm
Report this post
No News is Good News, DAQSEKK!!
I have a big thirst to find out who the cowerdly custard behind the alias of "What news". As "Jerry Springer" said (I never though I'd quote Jerry Springer") enjoy the bloody game, at least for us young folk :)
Enter your own Comments
Your Name:
Subject (Optional):
Your Comments:

These comments will not be posted live until they are reviewed

HOME | FEATURES | CLUBHOUSE | CAMPS | LINKS | ABOUT US | STORE | ADVERTISE
Use of this site is subject to certain Terms & Conditions.
Get our FREE Newsletter

  Search Articles
   
PFH Clubhouse Comment of the Week
MJWC: India: IHF official levels overage charges
By: Ankit Desai

Page Generation Time: 0.11 seconds.